The case against and why it sounds so reasonable
It's a fair argument. You have 12,000 Instagram followers who genuinely care about your writing. TikTok is driving pre-orders. Your newsletter is growing. Why, exactly, do you need to also maintain a website?
The answer changes depending on where you are in your career, which is partly why the question keeps coming up. For a brand-new writer with nothing to promote yet, a website can feel premature a distraction from the actual writing. For an established author, it can feel redundant everything seems to be working already.
Both of these positions are understandable. They're also wrong, and for the same reason: they confuse what's working right now with what you own.
"Your Instagram following is rented. Your TikTok reach is borrowed. Your website is the only place on the internet where you are the landlord."
What a website does that no platform can
Every social platform gives you access to an audience on their terms, through their interface, with their branding and their rules. A website gives you something fundamentally different.
When a reader signs up to your mailing list through your website, you own that contact. You can email them tomorrow, in five years, or the day your next book drops regardless of what happens to any platform. No algorithm decides whether they see it. No platform takes a cut of the attention. The list is yours.
When someone Googles your name a reader who just finished your book, a journalist researching a piece, a librarian ordering for a school your website is what they find. Not a feed of posts mixed with ads and other people's content. A clean, authoritative page that exists on your terms. Social profiles rank poorly and display inconsistently; a well-built website shows up exactly when it needs to.
On Instagram, your grid is your pitch. On TikTok, your last video is your pitch. On your website, you decide what a new reader sees first, second, and third. The tone, the imagery, the order of information all of it in service of the experience you want to create, not whatever the platform's layout algorithm dictates that week.
Every social post, every podcast appearance, every review in a magazine they all eventually point somewhere. Without a website, that somewhere is a fragmented collection of platform profiles. With a website, they all point to one place that you control. Your bio, your books, your newsletter signup, your press kit centralised and always up to date.
The reader trust factor
There's something quieter going on beneath all of this, and it's worth naming directly: a website signals that you take your writing seriously.
Readers who discover you through word of mouth or a recommendation will often check you out before buying. They will look for a website. If they find a beautiful, considered site that reflects the same care you put into your prose, it reinforces their decision to trust you with their time and money. If they find nothing or worse, a placeholder page or a stale Squarespace trial it creates friction.
This is not about vanity or status. It's about giving readers the reassurance they're looking for. The bar is not sky-high a clean, well-written website with the right information does the job. But nothing at all is a silent signal that you might not be a long-term investment.
"A reader who arrives at your website already likes you. Your job is simply not to give them a reason to doubt."
What happens when the platform changes
This is the argument that makes authors who dismissed websites suddenly become interested in them.
In 2013, Facebook reach was organic and abundant. Authors built communities of tens of thousands and reached most of them with every post. By 2016, that reach had been algorithmically throttled to under 2%, and authors had to pay to reach the audience they'd spent years building.
In 2022, Twitter was a primary platform for literary community, book recommendations, and author discovery. Within twelve months of new ownership, a significant portion of that community had fractured across half a dozen alternatives, and the coherent audience that existed there was gone.
TikTok was temporarily banned in the United States in January 2025. Authors who had built their entire discoverability strategy around BookTok had no fallback. The ones with websites and the email lists built through those websites kept their audience. The ones without lost contact with hundreds of thousands of potential readers, overnight, with no warning.
This isn't catastrophising. It's the documented pattern of every platform cycle. They grow, they attract creators, they change their economics, they decline or transform. The authors who weather these cycles are the ones who treated social media as a tool for bringing people back to their own home base not as the home base itself.
Your website is the only place on the internet that can't change its algorithm on you. You can't be deplatformed from your own domain.
What agents and publishers actually expect
If you're pursuing traditional publishing, this section is not optional reading.
Literary agents regularly look at an author's online presence when evaluating submissions not as the primary factor, but as a signal of platform, professionalism, and audience-building capability. A strong website signals that you understand the modern authoring landscape and have already started doing the work of connecting with readers.
For non-fiction authors especially, a website is close to non-negotiable. Publishers acquire non-fiction partly on the strength of the author's platform the size and engagement of the existing audience they bring to the book. A well-built website with a newsletter, clear expertise, and evidence of readership is direct evidence of platform. A social presence alone is not.
Even for fiction authors, a website is quietly expected. Not having one doesn't disqualify you, but having a thoughtful, well-crafted one is a mark in your favour. It shows you've thought past the manuscript to the career.
Ready to build yours?
We design custom author websites from scratch no templates, no monthly subscriptions, no builder limitations. Just a site that's entirely and permanently yours.
The verdict
The question "do authors need a website?" is actually two questions in one:
Do you need one right now to sell books today? Possibly not. Social media and word of mouth can move copies without one, at least in the short term.
Do you need one if you're building a writing career that lasts? Yes. Unambiguously. The longer you wait, the more you're building on platforms you don't own, with no foundation to return to when those platforms inevitably change.
The authors who treat their website as the centre of their online presence and use social media to drive people back to it are the ones who still have their audiences intact five platform cycles later. The ones who outsourced everything to a single platform are the ones who end up rebuilding from scratch every few years.
A website is not a marketing tool you add when you're ready. It's the infrastructure you build before you need it, so that when you do need it, it's already working.